Search found 374 matches

by olzeke51
Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:42 pm
Forum: Serial Communication
Topic: ARMStamp RXD issue
Replies: 9
Views: 2548

Re: ARMStamp RXD issue

My main goal was to document the work-arounds/ awareness. If/when the kernel needs/gets updated - it could be incorporated at that time. ' But to do it specifically for those two minor situations - might not be a good ROI. Thanks for the consideration, though. Gary UART0 is not a BASIC keyword so .....
by olzeke51
Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:32 am
Forum: Serial Communication
Topic: ARMStamp RXD issue
Replies: 9
Views: 2548

Re: ARMStamp RXD issue

Hello Y'all, I have egg on most of my face. You need to know your tools & apps!! Basicchip was VERY patient and helpful. He put in 2+ hours one afternoon, and then 3 more late night/early morning posts (off channel). Drug out his hardware and did testing, even created some little routines - [might b...
by olzeke51
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:11 pm
Forum: Serial Communication
Topic: ARMStamp RXD issue
Replies: 9
Views: 2548

Re: ARMStamp RXD issue

The TXD situation was workable. ' the main issue was the RXD(1)- actual data getting in. it is interesting that the floating input , would actually capture the TXD data - for a short while !! [see the COMMAND data display - that was the RXD(1) data whhile the input was floating !!] ' can you test th...
by olzeke51
Sat Jun 08, 2019 12:01 pm
Forum: Serial Communication
Topic: ARMStamp RXD issue
Replies: 9
Views: 2548

ARMStamp RXD issue

First off - some of this is unorthodox procedure !! Attempting to create a Serial Comm link with the ARMstamp - I tested the ability to TXD first. -- Works,but did notice some "funnies" - a different Forum post. ' Did not connect the RXD line - (so it is floating?)- but later on did a RXD test and g...
by olzeke51
Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:52 am
Forum: Software issues
Topic: TCL versions are mismatched
Replies: 1
Views: 747

TCL versions are mismatched

I downloaded setupBasic.exe on 5/21 and installed in it's own folder.
BT is at 6.24 and it reports TclTerm as 7.07
.
but if I load TclTerm.exe from that new folder - I get version 7.04....
.
Can I get 7.07???
Thanks, gz
by olzeke51
Sat Jun 08, 2019 12:55 am
Forum: Software issues
Topic: ARMstamp serial nomenclature idiosyncracies
Replies: 0
Views: 847

ARMstamp serial nomenclature idiosyncracies

BASICtools 6.24 TclTerm 7.07 ARMbasic[9.43] ARMbasic Kernel[8.40b] with Floating Point for the LPC11U37 1) on the ARMstamp - txfree(0) reports 128 always -- while outputting txt on USB/TXD(0) - seems okay since its 115Kbaud ................... txfree(0) reports a diminishing buffer value while outpu...
by olzeke51
Sat May 25, 2019 10:58 pm
Forum: Software issues
Topic: RTC_hooks
Replies: 1
Views: 759

RTC_hooks

I was updating my RTC_fake.bas file to use the printf/sprintf BASIC words instead of characters (for the 0). .it got me to thinking.... ?1) are the hooks for HOUR/DAY/MINUTE etc in all of the firmwares or just those with RTC-ability? . ?2) is there some way, [perhaps via an ISR] to utilize those fun...
by olzeke51
Sat Jan 26, 2019 4:48 pm
Forum: Software issues
Topic: 54102_Shared_Memory
Replies: 3
Views: 1710

Re: 54102_Shared_Memory

MY BAD - I was writing/reading a non-aligned memory address.--causing the hard fault. :oops:
Bruce caught that in an offline discussion.
[too much 8bit world in my mind/experience!!]
by olzeke51
Sat Jan 26, 2019 3:15 am
Forum: Software issues
Topic: 54102_Shared_Memory
Replies: 3
Views: 1710

Re: 54102_Shared_Memory

I was able to read / write the M0 memory area &H03400600- okay
'
in the &H2017c0x
Tried to JUST read the M0/M4 communication memory area - got hardfault in the M0 program
'
the M4 had no problem writing/reading that same area
HTH
by olzeke51
Sat Jan 26, 2019 2:07 am
Forum: Software issues
Topic: 54102_Shared_Memory
Replies: 3
Views: 1710

54102_Shared_Memory

I was attempting to use the M0-M4 communication memory region to pass a variable. 1) It wouldn't compile unless I used parenthesis around the CONST - [this isn't indicated in the online 'Help file' for * Pointers 2) hard faulting in the M0 - see the 'code' address [and I also ' commented it out - wi...